Pass Guaranteed Quiz PSE-Strata-Pro-24 - Accurate Online Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Training Materials

Our Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) PDF file is portable which means customers can carry this real questions document to any place. You just need smartphones, or laptops, to access this Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) PDF format. These Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) questions PDFs are also printable. So candidates who prefer to study in the old way which is paper study can print Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) questions PDF as well.

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Architecture and Planning: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Architects and emphasizes understanding customer requirements and designing suitable deployment architectures. Candidates must explain Palo Alto Networks' platform networking capabilities in detail and evaluate their suitability for various environments. Handling aspects like system sizing and fine-tuning is also a critical skill assessed in this domain.
Topic 2	Business Value and Competitive Differentiators: This section of the exam measures the skills of Technical Business Value Analysts and focuses on identifying the value proposition of Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs). Candidates will assess the technical business benefits of tools like Panorama and SCM. They will also recognize customer-relevant topics and align them with Palo Alto Networks' best solutions. Additionally, understanding Strata’s unique differentiators is a key component of this domain.
Topic 3	Deployment and Evaluation: This section of the exam measures the skills of Deployment Engineers and focuses on identifying the capabilities of Palo Alto Networks NGFWs. Candidates will evaluate features that protect against both known and unknown threats. They will also explain identity management from a deployment perspective and describe the proof of value (PoV) process, which includes assessing the effectiveness of NGFW solutions.
Topic 4	Network Security Strategy and Best Practices: This section of the exam measures the skills of Security Strategy Specialists and highlights the importance of the Palo Alto Networks five-step Zero Trust methodology. Candidates must understand how to approach and apply the Zero Trust model effectively while emphasizing best practices to ensure robust network security.

>> Online PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Training Materials <<

Earn the Credential of Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam

Once you have any questions about our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 actual exam, you can contact our staff online or send us an email. We have a dedicated all-day online service to help you solve problems. Before purchasing, you may be confused about what kind of PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Guide questions you need. You can consult our staff online. After the consultation, your doubts will be solved and you will choose the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 learning materials that suit you.

Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Sample Questions (Q20-Q25):

NEW QUESTION # 20
Regarding APIs, a customer RFP states: "The vendor's firewall solution must provide an API with an enforcement mechanism to deactivate API keys after two hours." How should the response address this clause?

A. No - The API keys can be made, but there is no method to deactivate them based on time.
B. Yes - This is the default setting for API keys.
C. No - The PAN-OS XML API does not support keys.
D. Yes - The default setting must be changed from no limit to 120 minutes.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Palo Alto Networks' PAN-OS supports API keys for authentication when interacting with the firewall's RESTful and XML-based APIs. By default, API keys do not have an expiration time set, but the expiration time for API keys can be configured by an administrator to meet specific requirements, such as a time-based deactivation after two hours. This is particularly useful for compliance and security purposes, where API keys should not remain active indefinitely.
Here's an evaluation of the options:
* Option A:This is incorrect because the default setting for API keys does not include an expiration time.
By default, API keys are valid indefinitely unless explicitly configured otherwise.
* Option B:This is incorrect because PAN-OS fully supports API keys. The API keys are integral to managing access to the firewall's APIs and provide a secure method for authentication.
* Option C:This is incorrect because PAN-OS does support API key expiration when explicitly configured. While the default is "no expiration," the feature to configure an expiration time (e.g., 2 hours) is available.
* Option D (Correct):The correct response to the RFP clause is that the default API key settings need to be modified to set the expiration time to 120 minutes (2 hours). This aligns with the customer requirement to enforce API key deactivation based on time. Administrators can configure this using the PAN-OS management interface or the CLI.
How to Configure API Key Expiration (Steps):
* Access theWeb InterfaceorCLIon the firewall.
* Navigate toDevice > Management > API Key Lifetime Settings(on the GUI).
* Set the desired expiration time (e.g., 120 minutes).
* Alternatively, use the CLI to configure the API key expiration:
set deviceconfig system api-key-expiry <time-in-minutes>
commit
* Verify the configuration using the show command or by testing API calls to ensure the key expires after the set duration.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks API Documentation: https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/apis
* Configuration Guide: Managing API Key Expiration

NEW QUESTION # 21
Which three use cases are specific to Policy Optimizer? (Choose three.)

A. Discovering 5-tuple attributes that can be simplified to 4-tuple attributes
B. Enabling migration from port-based rules to application-based rules
C. Discovering applications on the network and transitions to application-based policy over time
D. Converting broad rules based on application filters into narrow rules based on application groups
E. Automating the tagging of rules based on historical log data

Answer: B,C,E

Explanation:
The question asks for three use cases specific to Policy Optimizer, a feature in PAN-OS designed to enhance security policy management on Palo Alto Networks Strata Hardware Firewalls. Policy Optimizer helps administrators refine firewall rules by leveraging App-ID technology, transitioning from legacy port-based policies to application-based policies, and optimizing rule efficiency. Below is a detailed explanation of why options A, C, and E are the correct use cases, verified against official Palo Alto Networks documentation.
Step 1: Understanding Policy Optimizer in PAN-OS
Policy Optimizer is a tool introduced in PAN-OS 9.0 and enhanced in subsequent versions (e.g., 11.1), accessible under Policies > Policy Optimizer in the web interface. It analyzes traffic logs to:
* Identify applications traversing the network.
* Suggest refinements to security rules (e.g., replacing ports with App-IDs).
* Provide insights into rule usage and optimization opportunities.
Its primary goal is to align policies with Palo Alto Networks' application-centric approach, improving security and manageability on Strata NGFWs.

NEW QUESTION # 22
According to a customer's CIO, who is upgrading PAN-OS versions, "Finding issues and then engaging with your support people requires expertise that our operations team can better utilize elsewhere on more valuable tasks for the business." The upgrade project was initiated in a rush because the company did not have the appropriate tools to indicate that their current NGFWs were reaching capacity.
Which two actions by the Palo Alto Networks team offer a long-term solution for the customer? (Choose two.)

A. Suggest the inclusion of training into the proposal so that the operations team is informed andconfident in working on their firewalls.
B. Propose AIOps Premium within Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) to address the company's issues from within the existing technology.
C. Inform the CIO that the new enhanced security features they will gain from the PAN-OS upgrades will fix any future problems with upgrading and capacity.
D. Recommend that the operations team use the free machine learning-powered AIOps for NGFW tool.

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
* Free AIOps for NGFW Tool (Answer A):
* Thefree AIOps for NGFW toolusesmachine learning-powered analyticsto monitor firewall performance, detect potential capacity issues, and provide insights for proactive management.
* This tool helps operations teamsidentify capacity thresholds, performance bottlenecks, and configuration issues, reducing the reliance on manual expertise for routine tasks.
* By using AIOps, the customer can avoid rushed upgrade projects in the future, as the tool providespredictive insights and recommendationsfor capacity planning.
* AIOps Premium within Strata Cloud Manager (Answer D):
* AIOps Premiumis a paid version available within Strata Cloud Manager (SCM), offering more advanced analyticsand proactive monitoring capabilities.
* It helps address operational challenges byautomating workflowsand ensuring thehealth and performance of NGFWs, minimizing the need for constant manual intervention.
* This aligns with the CIO's goal of freeing up the operations team for more valuable business tasks.
* Why Not B:
* While training may help the operations team gain confidence, the long-term focus should be on reducing their manual workload by providingautomated toolslike AIOps. The CIO's concern indicates that relying on manual expertise for ongoing maintenance is not a scalable solution.
* Why Not C:
* Simply informing the CIO about enhanced features from a PAN-OS upgrade does not address the capacity planning issuesor reduce the dependency on the operations team for manual issue resolution.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* AIOps for NGFW Overview
* Strata Cloud Manager and AIOps Integration

NEW QUESTION # 23
A company with a large Active Directory (AD) of over 20,000 groups has user roles based on group membership in the directory. Up to 1,000 groups may be used in Security policies. The company has limited operations personnel and wants to reduce the administrative overhead of managing the synchronization of the groups with their firewalls.
What is the recommended architecture to synchronize the company's AD with Palo Alto Networks firewalls?

A. Configure a group mapping profile with an include group list.
B. Configure a group mapping profile, without a filter, to synchronize all groups.
C. Configure a group mapping profile with custom filters for LDAP attributes that are mapped to the user roles.
D. Configure NGFWs to synchronize with the AD after deploying the Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) and agents.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Synchronizing a large Active Directory (AD) with over 20,000 groups can introduce significant overhead if all groups are synchronized, especially when only a subset of groups (e.g., 1,000 groups) are required for Security policies. The most efficient approach is to configure agroupmapping profile with an include group listto minimize unnecessary synchronization and reduce administrative overhead.
* Why "Configure a group mapping profile with an include group list" (Correct Answer C)?Using a group mapping profile with aninclude group listensures that only the required 1,000 groups are synchronized with the firewall. This approach:
* Reduces the load on the firewall's User-ID process by limiting the number of synchronized groups.
* Simplifies management by focusing on the specific groups relevant to Security policies.
* Avoids synchronizing the entire directory (20,000 groups), which would be inefficient and resource-intensive.
* Why not "Configure a group mapping profile, without a filter, to synchronize all groups" (Option B)?Synchronizing all 20,000 groups would unnecessarily increase administrative and resource overhead. This approach contradicts the requirement to reduce administrative burden.
* Why not "Configure a group mapping profile with custom filters for LDAP attributes that are mapped to the user roles" (Option A)?While filtering LDAP attributes can be useful, this approach is more complex to implement and manage compared to an include group list. It does not directly address the problem of limiting synchronization to a specific subset of groups.
* Why not "Configure NGFWs to synchronize with the AD after deploying the Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) and agents" (Option D)?While the Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) is a modern solution for user and group mapping, it is unnecessary in this scenario. A traditional group mapping profile with an include list is sufficient and simpler to implement. CIE is typically used for complex hybrid or cloud environments.

NEW QUESTION # 24
A systems engineer (SE) has joined a team to work with a managed security services provider (MSSP) that is evaluating PAN-OS for edge connections to their customer base. The MSSP is concerned about how to efficiently handle routing with all of its customers, especially how to handle BGP peering, because it has created a standard set of rules and settings that it wants to apply to each customer, as well as to maintain and update them. The solution requires logically separated BGP peering setups for each customer. What should the SE do to increase the probability of Palo Alto Networks being awarded the deal?

A. Confirm to the MSSP that the existing virtual routers will allow them to have logically separated BGP peering setups, but that there is no method to handle the standard criteria across all of the routers.
B. Collaborate with the MSSP to create an API call with a standard set of routing filters, maps, and related actions, then the MSSP can call the API whenever they bring on a new customer.
C. Work with the MSSP to plan for the enabling of logical routers in the PAN-OS Advanced Routing Engine to allow sharing of routing profiles across the logical routers.
D. Establish with the MSSP the use of vsys as the better way to segregate their environment so that customer data does not intermingle.

Answer: C

Explanation:
To address the MSSP's requirement for logically separated BGP peering setups while efficiently managing standard routing rules and updates, Palo Alto Networks offers theAdvanced Routing Engineintroduced in PAN-OS 11.0. The Advanced Routing Engine enhances routing capabilities, including support forlogical routers, which is critical in this scenario.
Why A is Correct
* Logical routers enable the MSSP to create isolated BGP peering configurations for each customer.
* The Advanced Routing Engine allows the MSSP to share standard routing profiles (such as filters, policies, or maps) across logical routers, simplifying the deployment and maintenance of routing configurations.
* This approach ensures scalability, as each logical router can handle the unique needs of a customer while leveraging shared routing rules.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
* B:While using APIs to automate deployment is beneficial, it does not solve the need for logically separated BGP peering setups. Logical routers provide this separation natively.
* C:While virtual routers in PAN-OS can separate BGP peering setups, they do not support the efficient sharing of standard routing rules and profiles across multiple routers.
* D:Virtual systems (vsys) are used to segregate administrative domains, not routing configurations. Vsys is not the appropriate solution for managing BGP peering setups across multiple customers.
Key Takeaways:
* PAN-OS Advanced Routing Engine with logical routers simplifies BGP peering management for MSSPs.
* Logical routers provide the separation required for customer environments while enabling shared configuration profiles.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 11.0 Advanced Routing Documentation

NEW QUESTION # 25
......

There are three different versions of our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam questions to meet customers' needs you can choose the version that is suitable for you to study. If you buy our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 test torrent, you will have the opportunity to make good use of your scattered time to learn. If you choose our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 study torrent, you can make the most of your free time. So using our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Prep will help customers make good use of their fragmentation time to study and improve their efficiency of learning. It will be easier for you to pass your PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam and get your certification in a short time.

Valid Dumps PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Ppt: https://www.exams-boost.com/PSE-Strata-Pro-24-valid-materials.html

Craig Boyd Craig Boyd

Biography

Pass Guaranteed Quiz PSE-Strata-Pro-24 - Accurate Online Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Training Materials

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Earn the Credential of Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam

Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Sample Questions (Q20-Q25):

📞 Get in Touch

Quick Links

Services

Support